This is a long post but I'll voice my opinion here.
Similar to Xmair, religious reasons forbid me to be on the side of LGBTQ, plus, Jamaica is very and I mean very anti-gay and anti-queer, but let me not go there and answer from both a secular and everyday living perspective.
I personally believe the LGBTQ mindset is a psychological disorder that got a green light in the name of passion. To me, if there was a community rioting for incest, it would be no different, its a pursuit of freedom in the name of passion. Now the incestual community is far minor as there are more often than not biological consequences, the LGBTQ lack such a consequence to put burden on the government to support a bunch of disabled children all over the place. They can't have children, they adopt, or if they can through modifications? Idk, it would pose no health threat to the society, thus preference is granted.
The nature vs nurture point, many psychological disorders are blamed on neurochemistry imbalances that may manifest itself due to a predisposition to genetic disorders. Some have been proven. Me personally however, I don't believe in a gay gene, I don't believe people are born that way. But let's say I'm wrong and it actually does exist, I still put it down to nurturing as we are taught how to communicate and socially interact. If a baby is born without these lessons, gay gene or no gay gene, he/she would still not know how to interact and express themselves, thus in my eye, being gay is nurtured act at the end of the day. As an analogy, we all have the ability to kill a person, and some of us, mental disorder or not, get impulses to kill a person. We do not do it because we were never nurtured in support of killing people, we were nurtured against it, it's an internationally recognized crime, a bad doing with negative consequences.
Now, the movement we see is a nurturing act, a desensitization to the pursuit of this passion. It is very evident when you watch nowadays movies and worse, children's television that there are a lot of portrayed gay relationships. A gay character is one thing, but putting in this point of must having a gay relationship in every media imaginable appease what I believe is a warped sense of human rights, that is an agenda to nurture and I really don't like that.
My previous points on incest and nature vs nurture would lead us to believe then that gays should be allowed to desensitize as there are no readily perceived negatives, but there most definitely are. The gay community is non-productive one to the human race. I am against violence to gays and discrimination, but I am not against shutting down any and all desensitization movements. It is a means to an end as we need heterosexuals to continue with procreation. While very unlikely, the world drops dead with its last generation if everyone was gay, no more children to be born, no more children to adopt, we're just there until we kill ourselves off. That's one element of non-productivity that maybe the governments have been counting on as a means of population control. Does it make sense when you note the world population every decade or century? On limited land space burning up non-renewable resources faster than we can implement the use of renewable alternatives? Food for thought.
Another element of non-productivity is the confusion it brings. I remember watching the US News about some political debate on what bathroom should a transgender use, what prison should they go to, should we allow an imaginative child who doesn't know any better modify themselves and become transgender.....you know, the kind of ignorant imaginative mindset we can relate to wanting to be some super hero character we saw on cartoon with powers.....The legalization deployed by countries has brought us into a non-productive spiral of problems that didn't need to exist in the first place. All for what? The right to passion? As I said earlier, it is a psychological disorder that got a green light by big nations.
The sad thing is, the bigger nations are bullying the smaller nations to adopt the lifestyle and legalize gay marriages and the gay agenda, implicitly threatening embargos an alienation from world institutions. All that breeds is bitterness in the smaller nations and perpetuates ill will in the bigger ones, non-productive.