Alright gentlemen, that's enough, thanks. As Gohan said, this is not his application, it is Traphole's.
He presented some evidence against Traphole - if you want to contradict or oppose that evidence somehow, that's fine. If you just want to criticise Gohan as a person, this is not the place to do it, and it doesn't help Traphole whatsoever.
***
Side note: People would do well to read up on 'ad hominem' arguments and why they're so weak. Here's a lil pyramid representing 'Graham's hierarchy of disagreement' which is pretty good. The bottom represents the least effective/useful means of disagreement, the top represents the most:
edit - here's another useful pic. It explains the different logical fallacies that fall under the 'ad hominem' category.