1
VC:MP General / Re: Another one..
« on: May 05, 2024, 05:26:25 am »
I admire the effort
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hunting whatsup? Come on bring more evidence against gerz. lets get this topic to 1k replies.im following :eyes:
The forum discussion revolves around accusations of a player using cheats in a gaming server. Various users presented arguments both in favor of and against the alleged cheating, providing their interpretations of the evidence provided, such as a Dailymotion video.
From the conversation, it's evident that there are conflicting viewpoints. Some users strongly believe that the player in question indeed used cheats, citing specific moments in the video as evidence. On the other hand, opposing users argue that the evidence might be misleading, potentially edited or misinterpreted.
The discussion includes technical aspects related to gaming mechanics, server commands, and different types of hacks, showcasing a detailed analysis of the alleged cheating incidents. However, it's challenging to draw a definitive conclusion without more concrete evidence or a comprehensive investigation.
In such cases, it's important for gaming communities to have clear guidelines, anti-cheat measures, and fair investigation processes to address such allegations appropriately. Ultimately, a fair and thorough investigation based on solid evidence is crucial to determine the veracity of the accusations.
This gaming forum thread appears to revolve around accusations of cheating within the VC:MP (Vice City Multiplayer) community. A user named HacksBuster1337 has accused another player, GerZ, of using hacks and modifying game files, particularly the weapon.dat file, to gain unfair advantages in the game. HacksBuster1337 presents various evidence, including videos and descriptions of GerZ's alleged cheating behavior, such as rapid firing, modified shotgun reloads, and other anomalies in gameplay.
GerZ responds, dismissing the accusations and claiming that HacksBuster1337 tends to accuse players who defeat him of using hacks. He defends himself by stating that he hasn't been banned for hacks since 2017.
Other users, including Hazard and Lol55, chime in with their perspectives and evidence, supporting or refuting the accusations against GerZ. Hazard provides counter-evidence, attempting to debunk accusations made against him and also presents evidence against GerZ, alleging multiple instances of cheating, including speed hacks, modified animations, and tool usage.
The thread includes detailed descriptions, video links (some removed due to strikes), screenshots, and discussions regarding specific instances of alleged cheating, bans, and disputes between players.
In summary, the thread revolves around allegations of cheating in VC:MP, with users presenting evidence and arguments both for and against the accused player, GerZ.
Ooh wow this thread is like old school VC:MP. Nice.Somehow I'm excited to see it. On the other hand, I don't have the energy to go through it anymore :'(
either your clan members are not very active or i dont see them whatever
I don't see any need for you to remove them ulker. I've gotta disagree with vedder here. Nothing wrong with it imo. Nothing to offend you. These 2 things resembled good memories of the league that we won and ulker was a main part of it. Also I don't remember that anyone ever took a signature seriously on this forum.
As for the phrase and the banner, I don't really understand why this has all of a sudden become "offensive" to you when I've mostly forgotten and left them unchanged on my profile since year and a half after my departure and even during the whole duration of when I first reapplied. The phrase was coined a long time ago but we, (our roster at the time,) repopularised it during our amazing comeback in the EAD / VCAD League. The meme banner is a fun memory of when PunkNoodle edited the Turkish President and Indian PM onto Charley's infamous banner for me and Lederhos respectively - who I should mention still had his one when he reapplied too.
Frankly I don't see anything wrong with either of these, but despite my opinion I've still gone ahead and removed both of them for your comfort. I hope none of this has offended you any further, I felt that what you said was out of context and filled it in accordingly.