I know very well how USA was formed, vito. Apparently you don't.
The only reason their revolution managed to go successfully is the distance the Brits had to cover to even get to them. The british weren't getting any tax efficiency from them, spent loads of money just on troop transport, half their supplies being either depleted or destroyed by pirate skirmishes on the way over, effectively making the war useless and a waste of both effort and resources.
Now then, Vito the economist, tell me, how does a country like say Honduras as King already gave that example, single handedly create an economy that suits all the needs of its market? I assure you, if you can answer that question, you might as well become prime minister of your country.
The answer is you can't. The reason is very simple. You need to have a good starting capital and infrastructure to build upon, and if you don't have those, you need to create them. The process of creating a successfull economical strategy takes approximately 20 years to even create a slight effect. And suggesting that a country should go to war to proclaim its economical dominancy is both wrong in practice, and in ethics.
True, that system was existent in Medieval times, where a country when facing economical inefficiency had 2 options, going to war or increasing taxes. But that system is now non existent, and economical ground is gained through researching the market, strategizing and applying the least risky business option.
The most obvious example of all, is of course, Switzerland.