login
May 17, 2024, 02:27:47 pm

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vito

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
136
Clan War Stuff / Re: TRC vs VU
« on: October 17, 2016, 09:05:39 pm »
I saw only 2 wars in ctf, one was ended as server crash, second as powercut. I want to spec this too.

137
Denied Applications / Re: Application - MIMO
« on: October 16, 2016, 01:27:52 pm »
Congratulations

138
Birthday Board / Re: HBD Milka the ice
« on: October 08, 2016, 05:39:54 pm »

139
VC:MP General / Re: XE
« on: October 04, 2016, 03:47:07 pm »
Quote from: Charley on October 01, 2016, 10:50:12 am
This is too simplistic an analysis.
...
Just look at how many people applied to be admin in my 'admin applications' thread compared to how many applied on the XE forum.
I just leave this discussion.

140
VC:MP General / Re: XE
« on: September 30, 2016, 03:58:17 pm »
When one species die next one will take that niche. After old XE new XE is EC. Nowdays XE is a name from the past. Just a name in official tab of master list. If one really wants to make new XE one needs to kill EC before. Because it is one niche (same gamemode for players). All actual community who likes XE style of game is already playing in EC. Origin of these copies (and how it named) is absolutely not important for players. If you check (new) XE management's replies here you can see - they are talking about how to calling ranks of server's staff instead about players and gameplay.

141
VC:MP General / Re: XE
« on: September 30, 2016, 12:28:50 pm »
XE already was dead, so in fact it was just a copy of EC (alive alternative of XE) with old brand for community attraction. Let dead servers stay in the past.

142
VC:MP General / Re: Toxicity Over VCMP
« on: September 25, 2016, 02:30:37 pm »
Good luck in your marriage. You will be good papa.

143
Off Topic / Re: Hello
« on: September 10, 2016, 07:02:13 pm »
Bye Karan.

144
Farewell Board / Re: Leaving the community of VC:MP.
« on: September 08, 2016, 09:59:34 pm »
Good luck in your real life.

145
Server Discussion / Re: [0.4] XE | European Release Information
« on: July 26, 2016, 06:30:12 pm »
I have heard more freedom was there, rhino, hunters and so on. Is it true?

146
VC:MP General / Re: [ON] clan - a bunch of cheaters?
« on: July 19, 2016, 09:23:31 am »
Quote from: NewK on July 19, 2016, 08:57:49 am
The hack creator is a member of ON, he can create new hacks and start distributing them again to more ON members. Banning only the players who used the hacks does nothing since this person can keep creating hacks and sharing them with his clan, which why the clan itself needs to be banned.
Well and why you think banning [ON] will stop him to share his hacks? He can share it not for [ON] only. He can share it for everybody as his revenge. Judge people for their behavior not for their membership.

147
VC:MP General / Re: [ON] clan - a bunch of cheaters?
« on: July 19, 2016, 08:31:18 am »
Quote from: NewK on July 19, 2016, 01:28:58 am
A long ban instead of a permanent one acts as a way of regulating player behaviour just lke you said.
One year for all is too long. It's like death penalty in server. They will evade it and will be in illegal status, then they will get bans for ban evading and so on. Do you want it?
Long ban is good for only a hack's creator and for people who shared this hacks for others (ban for them should be a bit less than for a hack's creator). If people just used it without any type of sharing they should be banned as normal cheaters with shorter period. If player was just [ON] member and not used the hack he should be not banned at all. I hope the collective punishment will stay in middle ages. It's my option about that. 

148
VC:MP General / Re: [ON] clan - a bunch of cheaters?
« on: July 18, 2016, 11:49:36 pm »
I don't belive banning of whole clan will help to prevent sharing cheats, and people who using hacks usually know how to evade bans. Also I think the punishment should be a method of regulation of people's behavior and not a revenge. Forcing to split them with a long bans for all will make they to stay together harder aganist you. Better option is different bans based on personal contribution in cheating popularization and cheating using for each of them. It will really split them and gives a chance to back to normal vcmp life for most of them.

149
Denied Applications / Re: Application - Mahrozulamin
« on: July 14, 2016, 03:13:31 pm »
Lol Mahroz, I thought you never join any clan.

150
Off Topic / Re: IRC fun logs
« on: July 08, 2016, 07:08:05 pm »
Quote from: MIMO on July 08, 2016, 12:47:12 pm
http://imgur.com/CVasxRY

http://imgur.com/ruhyKEV
Quote
<[TRC]Amir> Hi Sora
<[TRC]Amir> morphine
<[TRC]Amir> vitosca
* ANONlMUL has quit (Ping timeout: 121 seconds)
* ANONlMUL (ANONWork@gtanet-3sq.jpv.117.185.IP) has joined
<[TRC]Amir> Hi Sora
<morphine> wow
<[TRC]Amir> hi morphine
<[TRC]Amir> give me link chlenix1337
<vitosca> yep, he is ready for chlenix, as he said
<[TRC]Amir> give me
<[TRC]Amir> give me link
<[TRC]Amir> morphine
<[TRC]Amir> give me link
<[TRC]Amir> vitosca
<[TRC]Amir> give me link
<[TRC]Amir> i want chlenix
<vitosca> morphine will give it to you.
<[TRC]Amir> ok
* ANONlMUL has quit (Connection closed)
<[TRC]Amir> i wait
<[TRC]Amir> why morphine off the IRC
<HunTinG> [TRC]HunTinG
<[TRC]Amir> give me link chlenix
<[TRC]Amir> Hunting
<[TRC]Amir> give me link chlenix
<[TRC]Amir> Hi Hunting


Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]