May 01, 2024, 01:23:27 am

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GangstaRas

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 64
556
Going for a gtx 960 will be good that means.
The thing which daze me is that should I go for DDR 4 Ram and a new motherboard ?
I have heard that the main difference b/w DDR3 and DDR4 is the power consumption and it will not effect my gaming experience at all, is that correct ?
also a 450W psu will be enough to run a gtx 960 ?
As of now, yeah that's the only advantage generally of DDR4. Games have not been optimized yet to take advantage of the huge bandwidth jump however iGPUs benefit significantly as they use the main system RAM as VRAM. Personally I would say to invest in a DDR4 system simply because the technology is newer and there is no price disadvantage really. DDR3 and DDR4 and all computer components supporting each side cost almost the same money so might as well buy the latest.

When looking at PSUs you have to look at the brand and the failure rate. Seasonic is a good place to invest but you can buy EVGA, Antec, Cooler Master or Corsair ones too (be cautious of which Corsair). 450 W is enough, I'm running my 960 on an Corsair CX430 which is only a 430W PSU. Not one issue running the card nor overclocking it. If you have overclockable CPUs however, I'd personally be more comfortable with 500W PSUs

557
General Discussions / Re: voice war 6
« on: April 12, 2016, 01:58:34 pm »
Refer back to this

These are the changes you can expect. Possible additions considered but are not guaranteed.

Quote
Current Official Changes To Be Made:

Kills - cash only; Bases - cash & points

Up to 60 FPS; 30 FPS minimum


Possible Additions:

Pizza boys & Skimmers

Displaying Points as apart of HUD

Allowing you to keep premium weapons after you die, timeout or leave (gone only when ammo runs out)

Above all else, be patient.

558
VC:MP General / Re: XE
« on: April 12, 2016, 01:29:22 pm »
Charley, could you elaborate the head of the leadership structure that you suggested?

My understanding is that there is always a de facto owner of every community. That is the person who pays for stuff and has the root access to the host. How do you plan to dissolve this position?
This

The way how I registered what Charley wants reminded me of how Open Source software works. The community literally builds and contributes to the software's code, design, almost everything and makes it better. But there still is and have to be some executive body behind it all that accepts/denies what's coming in so its hard for me to picture

559
Same here.
I'm running an i3 2120 but with a GTX 960. It performs phenomenal in almost every game. GTA 5 is the only game I've come across wherein my i3 limits my framerates to some extent. I'm in no mood of buying a new motherboard so i will settle for something like an i5 3470 or 3570k ( will have to see which one is available here)
Same plan I had. Might want to look into the Xeons though if your motherboard supports them, they're excellent for the money, i7 performance for i5 prices. Their only downfall is no iGPU depending on the model, so if your card dies, your system is temporarily dead :P

560
I'm currently using i3 3220
12 gb DDR 3 ran (4+8)
ECS H61H2-MV Intel Motherboard
and a geforce 610GT 2gb
1TB HDD

I was about to leave this PC for my Dad's office, but since its going out of budget, I will upgrade it instead.
Any recommendations ?

Get a real GPU and a PSU to match. The i3 3220 is going to need an upgrade eventually to an i5 but its definitely capable of satisfying you for a good while if paired with a good GPU. I have the i3 3240 but a GTX 960



Windows 10 compatible with VCMP, I'm on Windows 10, didn't even have to flip one compatibility setting

561
VC:MP General / Re: XE
« on: April 11, 2016, 08:23:11 pm »
Well if I may add, perhaps there is some misunderstanding, as such, I'll express my understanding of things and maybe you guys can clarify.

From what I got from aki's post is that:

Charley will be granted management position along with a current XE staff member of your admin's list alongside him to coordinate the transition --- a step in the right direction to me

George and aki will dictate what is good and what is bad in the best interest of XE's development to prevent any form of ill-fates in serious management situations --- an understandable role

The XE forums currently as is will now become a scaffold for molding the long & overdue renovations needed --- a step in the right direction to me

All inactive members are kicked immediately but the current staff remains in place --- no problem to me; personally I never saw why they felt threatened. Though I question what is being done behind the scenes to contribute as "activity" to a dead server, if XE deems them honestly active then not one of the active members should be kicked, it's only fair after all

All the proposed admins by Charley must go through XE --- understandable but I think something has been off here from day one. As someone who "applied" to Charley's admin setup, I never expected to walk in as an admin into XE just like that, XE's admin application board has a nice reputation (at least how I remember it back in 2010), a walk in was definitely impossible for those who applied based on such thoughts. The way I viewed it from the get-go was that it was a recommendation of whom Charley sees very fit for the role he has given each individual. With Charley to supposedly become manager, this list of "recommendations" comes along with him and would be discussed per application. So none of that VU forums XE has legal rights bullshit

That's my understanding of things, and if something is misunderstood on my part, please clarify but this would be how I think it ought to be

562
They are powerful, I currently have PCIe SSDs running at 1GB+ speeds, boot up times less than a second
These ones, how much PCIe lanes they use?

563
Birthday Board / Re: Aaron
« on: April 10, 2016, 10:26:49 am »
Big up the earthstrong Aaron!!

Raspect  O0

564
Birthday Board / Re: Happy birthday GangstaRas!
« on: April 10, 2016, 03:06:27 am »
Thanks for all the birthday wishes guys. You know typically I'm not a guy that celebrates birthdays but my girlfriend decided to change that today. Despite the money I burnt I had a blast today, it was well enjoyed  O0

565
Intel SSDs are a good place to invest. In technicality they're probably better than the Samsungs but its nothing to brag home about, so you just buy the cheaper one (Intel SSDs are overpriced)

566
News and Announcements / Re: PROMOTION!
« on: April 04, 2016, 10:39:43 pm »
Angela I want you to go look back through your application. You will understand just how proud I am especially of you :). It's like watching the daughter I never had grow up. Congratulations on this achievement  ^-^

567
News and Announcements / Re: VU renamed to ULK
« on: April 01, 2016, 07:06:33 pm »
Who in heaven's name desecrated my beautiful art?  >:(
=ULK=Stormart   O0

O0



Applying for US citizenship to ease the filing of charging you for one count of vandalism of art

568
VC:MP General / Re: XE
« on: April 01, 2016, 06:29:32 pm »

Quote
But given the amount of respectable clans we have currently they may increase in the future(I'm talking about years from now) so this number will have to be eventually dropped imo. Just cautioning you at this stage

I'm not sure exactly what you mean - how will a rise in the number of influential clans affect this? If the rule is constitutional, then it will take a majority vote from the staff to change it.


I think what he means is that this percentage value at the moment should only be used to bring across your idea but the figure itself is not plausible. By saying 25%, you are saying that there are only 4 clans in existence that can make up staff if all staff members are apart of a clan. The clan variety is obviously wider than just 4 and so whatever figure that is to be used would have to continually express that, hence its eventual drop as time progresses in the fairness of new clans. An absolute value would have to be used instead e.g. 10 per clan or something.


My issue with it though and I see it as a continual trend for all servers, is the viewpoint that shares need to be established for fairness; let me address that this is not how fairness is issued. For if you so happen to have a clan member that is far beyond expectations to be qualified for a particular staff work, are you really going to deny him because you already have x amount of his clan buddies on board? Similarly would you recognize his ability and as such kick one of the less gifted staff members from his clan to uphold the staff share when you add in the "better" guy? What if a vast majority of members that are appointed from only one particular clan are just handsdown the best persons you've ever came acrossed, both morally and functionally? What if there's an unsure potential cream from the crop member that is in a clan that has bad reputation? Would his affiliation affect your choice? What do you really do? The system is bullshit.

The underlying problem is that you all care too much about opinions from people that you probably cant hold a sensible moral conversation with. Dont deny a capable person and dont kick the less capable but very functional person for the sake of saying "this is an unbiased staff". Instead, you guys need to do 2 very essential things:

  • Hold your chest high and stand by the decisions you make in having the best staff extracted from the community. This means you value the individuals more than their associations.
  • Be welcoming. When you're welcoming you will know the community a lot more than just the scope of the clan members of a ruling person(s) in charge of the server. When you're welcoming you definitely wont just full the staff of your clan buddies either

So to fully exercise this cuz the efforts so far by Charley have been welcoming of the community, dissolve the need of "a balance". The message is to everyone, you dont need a balance, you need a change of focus. Watch the individual, not the clan

569
News and Announcements / Re: VU renamed to ULK
« on: April 01, 2016, 05:01:47 pm »
Who in heaven's name desecrated my beautiful art?  >:(

570
VC:MP General / Re: XE: Apply to be staff
« on: March 29, 2016, 06:15:45 pm »
Nickname: [VU]GangstaRas

Additional role(s) wanted: Artworker/designer

Have you played on the XE server before? Yes

Have you ever been on the XE staff, and if so, when? Yes, early 2010, level 3 moderator but I lost it due to improper notification of being away for exams

Other previous experience:
  • EC Administrator
  • VCDC Administrator
  • Vice War 5 Administrator
  • Designed Vice War 3's Banner
  • Designed Vice Underdog's current Banner
  • Coordinated the Designs of VU's VCDC Flyers posted on the walls surrounding the ring

Accepted as Managing Admin. Additional roles: artworker/designer

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 64