who?

"A roleplayer that can still kick your ass"

Some in the DM scene do not know me as I don't play DM that actively (LW currently only server I play on)

Kessuz0r

Are you bored?

One might say something like that

Quote

Where was MK? Where was VU? Where was moro?

You can cry all you want about the result of the event, but it's not the fault of the administration nor the blue team players that there was one time in the event where reds had more players online.

Not all the members of my clan have played or at least I think so because I weren't online all the vice war but I've seen some members justl ike Rodrigo,Hockz,Dev(including myself) who were online not only 5 min.I don't have any idea what happened to VU and moro.
Like I'm crying,what about using sometimes the logic Kessu?Why your brain is too obsessed to win and can't understand we were outnumbered the entire match?You didn't win because of your skills,you won because we were outnumbered,stop talking shit

I don't give a slightest of fuck if blue won or not, ViceWar was an attempt to get the VCMP community back at it with the new client.

You're whining about losing due to being outnumbered, only thing my logic is telling me that YOU wanted to be on the winning side, and you would have absolutely zero problems (just like last ViceWar, reds had no problems with the numbers because they had advantage, they had problem because blue had the skill).

This time around blue had nearly the same team line up with most of the pakis going blue, which in return they did not play at all on either side.

As I said, blue was more committed to the event than red ever was and that is why we had the numbers.

Force balancing every paki to red team would leave reds with high number advantage but that still wouldn't of changed the fact that INGAME BLUE HAD THE NUMBERS DUE TO BEING COMMITTED TO THE EVENT.

I'm fairly sure that when Stormeus posts the stats you'll see tops 30 blue players who played alot in the event, with 5-10 reds who did the same.

Well blue team, congrats, you guys were really better this year, and it had nothing to do with numbers ;P
However, it's the overall playercount that bugs me, I'm not sure if the server actually ever hit the limit yesterday, instead having 20 players online in average. That's a bit of a letdown considering the last few VW's scale, and I guess it's that way because of the technical issues we've had with the event dates.

Hopefully, we'll have some more awesome events hosted on 0.4 and achieve the playercount that once was

Biggest disappointment in the event was the lack of attending from the hosting clan IMO.

Even if no one else shows up, the hosting clan MUST have more than 2 members playing more than 1 hour in the event...

If stormeus can keep the server up then there should really not be a problem.

0.4 is a really cool client and deserves alot more attention than what it's currently getting.

And Seph; you worded your post wrong. You do not want to extend the event, but just keep the server playable for as long as possible.

Anyone claiming this topic is about blue vs red can go pull their head out of their ass.

Ingame Nickname: [DnA]AEO
Ping on Sky-City: 160-170

Already added as ULK AEO

Stormeus needs to change your name if you absolutely cannot play with ULK tag.

My apologizes,didn't know(or didn't read) the scripters had some problems anyway what about balacing the teams?

The event has diplomacy for a reason. If you cannot get other teams to join yours then you're the one to blame.

Stop whining about it, last time blue's were at a player disadvantage and won with over 1000 points.

A little more detail about what still needs to happen, and a new date where VW4 possibly might happen, would be appreciated.

Scripts need to be finished and date is not known at this time.